Lindsay Clancy's lawyer asks Trump to pardon her after mistrial

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rto
    Moderator
    • Oct 2024
    • 826

    Lindsay Clancy's lawyer asks Trump to pardon her after mistrial

    Lindsay Clancy's attorney Kevin Reddington said he is hopeful for an agreement between the defense and the district attorney after Clancy's trial ended last week in a hung jury.

    Reddington also said he hopes President Donald Trump would consider a pardon for his client.


    Clancy's lawyer is the one that is crazy. She should have been shot while trying to escape or something, she doesn't deserve to live.
  • 4thIDvet
    Slug
    • Oct 2024
    • 1751

    #2
    I listened to her lawyer speak to the judge for about 20 minutes. What he wants.

    He wants the chick set free as 11 jurors are voting for acquittal. The one hold out juror says NO guilty. Her lawyer says the man did not read or understand the evidence so she is NOT guilty? Hmmm Frig him the man can vote however he wants period. The lawyer is grasping for straws and is wrong and the judge knows it. A mistrial is coming if it has not already?

    ADD: Maybe the 11 jurors did not follow the evidence ???

    Comment


    • STG44
      STG44 commented
      Editing a comment
      just look at were those 11 wack jobs live tells all you need to know
  • GimpyPaw
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2024
    • 429

    #3
    Fuck that bitch. If it gives the husband an opening to strangle her like she did to his children, then I'm OK with a pardon. Anything else, she rots at the end of a rope if I had a say in it.

    Comment

    • 44044
      Slug
      • Oct 2024
      • 717

      #4
      That bitch needs choked to death…

      Comment

      • Bluntforce
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2024
        • 442

        #5
        Throat fuck her with a cactus.

        Comment

        • 4thIDvet
          Slug
          • Oct 2024
          • 1751

          #6
          Their are lots and lots of women sitting in a jail cell for killing their child who will be praying this chick gets acquitted.

          "Infanticide (or infant homicide) is the intentional killing of infants or offspring. Infanticide was a widespread practice throughout human history that was mainly used to dispose of unwanted children"

          Infanticide - Wikipedia

          Sand niqqers do it legally in their home countries. "Sharia Law" and their trying to bring the law here.

          Comment

          • rto
            Moderator
            • Oct 2024
            • 826

            #7
            That lawyer must have forgotten that Trump can't pardon that criminal, she didn't commit a federal crime.

            Comment

            • GARANDNUT
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2024
              • 359

              #8
              Originally posted by 4thIDvet
              I listened to her lawyer speak to the judge for about 20 minutes. What he wants.

              He wants the chick set free as 11 jurors are voting for acquittal. The one hold out juror says NO guilty. Her lawyer says the man did not read or understand the evidence so she is NOT guilty? Hmmm Frig him the man can vote however he wants period. The lawyer is grasping for straws and is wrong and the judge knows it. A mistrial is coming if it has not already?

              ADD: Maybe the 11 jurors did not follow the evidence ???
              What that lawyer did was unprofessional and highly unethical. You never attack the jury or even worse call one out. If I was the judge I would submit an ethics complaint to the local BPR but most criminal judges are pussies so it wont happen. Also, the prosecution's attorney was not very impressive. I listened to her direct examination of the State's expert and she has no idea how to ask a non-leading question. I suspect the prosecution figured this was a slam dunk and got lazy. This case should have been a slam dunk.

              Comment

              • 4thIDvet
                Slug
                • Oct 2024
                • 1751

                #9
                Originally posted by GARANDNUT

                What that lawyer did was unprofessional and highly unethical. You never attack the jury or even worse call one out. If I was the judge I would submit an ethics complaint to the local BPR but most criminal judges are pussies so it wont happen. Also, the prosecution's attorney was not very impressive. I listened to her direct examination of the State's expert and she has no idea how to ask a non-leading question. I suspect the prosecution figured this was a slam dunk and got lazy. This case should have been a slam dunk.
                Yes should have been a guilty which most all of them are. As you know pleading insanity is a tough try but when its hopeless to win hell give it a go. Well hell the defense was one vote away from that exception. I did not follow the trial but the defense lawyer must have gotten into the animals kill their young man is just an animal and this 'Infanticide' is why she did it.
                BINGO holy sheeet they bought it. But not one bought it and now the whole world suddenly got interested in the trial. Now its a battle of hell your family dog or cat rejects one of their litter. Apes in the wild are notorious for rejecting one of theirs so why can't my mom sitting here do it? This one juror brought the trial from page 6 to front page news. To be continued. ​​​​​​

                Comment

                Working...